Home › Forum › Ask A Member › 1977 Mercury 500
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 6 months ago by
crosbyman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 30, 2021 at 3:07 pm #247534
I recently purchased a 1977 Mercury 500 for my 17ft. 1959 Lyman. The motor looks good but while installing it I noticed that there is no fuel line connector on the motor, only a 3/16 ID fuel hose hanging off the tee from the carbs. Can someone help me with understanding what are the correct connectors to be used on this motor? any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Gary
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by
garymcmanus.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by
garymcmanus.
September 30, 2021 at 3:33 pm #247540check other models using your serial #
btw… great find …looks fantastic and well taken care of had one years ago nice…smooth troller check compression and wiring for frayed wires.
Joining AOMCI has priviledges 🙂
October 1, 2021 at 5:42 am #2475633/16″ is too small. It should have a bayonet style twist-on connector. These should be easy to find. Each carb has its own, built-in fuel pump; so you’re not missing anything there. When right, those were some of the finest-running two-stroke engines ever built. Like Crosbyman said, though, look for deterioration of wire insulation. That era Mercury was known for that. Connector should look something like this:
Plumbing should look like this:
https://www.marineengine.com/parts/mercury-outboard-parts/500-50/4357640-thru-5531629-usa/carburetor-linkage-and-choke-solenoidA couple more thoughts: Yours was right around the time Mercury transitioned to stainless steel shafts in the gear case. This would be a good thing, if you have it. I think you do; but it’s close. Also, if the water pump impeller is more than two years old, do not even THINK about launching the boat until that is replaced. The impellers were rubber, attached to a brass hub and that attachment method would fail, without warning, sometimes in as little as two years. Your engine would cook before you had a chance to slow down. Another thought is that, since those engines had no thermostat and four cylinders, they used quite a bit of fuel That would be normal.
Long live American manufacturing!
October 1, 2021 at 7:57 am #247566As i recall fuel wise….pulling a skier we were burning a 5 gal tank in about 1.5 hr max
for trolling with my flat bottom wood skif (18 feet is my memory is ok) we would troll all day with 5 gal (6 US gal)
a day’s fishing walleye 20 miles out or so and trolling all day would burn a total of 15 gal. (18US) but what a great feeling !!
Gas was $1.00/gal in the bush outfitter (a rip-off) with gas being 60-70 cents/gal in the big city !
today my 75 ETEC burns 2 cups of gas/ hour (. 6 liter/hr) trolling) 🙂
Joining AOMCI has priviledges 🙂
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.