Home › Forum › Ask A Member › Prop Shaft Identification Help
- This topic has 17 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 27, 2020 at 1:32 pm #226069
Hoping someone can assist with some vintage OMC part numbers…
Several years back I got 2 non-working, almost-identical engines: a ’59 Johnson Javelin and ’59 Gale Buccaneer. Both were in rough shape, but between the two, there were enough good parts to build one good engine. The issues were in the powerheads….both gear cases were in good shape.
The ’57 Johnson shaft has a thread-on prop nut; the ’59 Gale has the keyed + cotterpin nut arrangement. I used the Gale gearcase on the final engine, and it has worked flawlessly. The Johnson gearcase is a spare on the shelf.
First-world problem: I decided that I wanted both shafts to have the keyed + cotterpin type of prop nut, so I decided to change the shaft in the spare unit. All my research led me to shaft # 312867. Found one on eBay.. Today, with nothing else to do, I decided to swap the shafts. NOPE! Not happening. Hit an issue I hadn’t anticipated.
The 312867 shaft that I bought is dimensionally identical to the existing shaft in the Johnson gearcase (302522), but the splines are different!
312867…shaft I bought on eBay…23 splines
302522…shaft that’s in the Johnson…22 splinesSeems that I need a 22-spline shaft (or I could find a 23-spline dog). Does anyone know if OMC used (under any name, including Gale, MW, Viking, etc.) a 22-spline shaft with a keyed prop nut?
I could easily reassemble the Johnson gearcase & keep 2 types of prop nuts in my toolbag (like I said, this is a first-world problem), but if there’s a correct shaft, I’d use it. Any idea if what I’m looking for exists?
Thanks
EDIT: 305105 seems to be the 23-spline clutch dog for this eBay shaft, but will it engage the existing gears in the ’57 Johnson? Anyone know?
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
-
This topic was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
December 27, 2020 at 8:08 pm #226113I’m sure Frank can chime in here, but are you sure both those shafts are dimensionally identical in all areas? It appears as though the two gearcases use a different forward bearing along with the forward gear thrust washer, did you measure the prop shaft diameter on the forward gear side of the prop shaft? It almost looks as though the 23 spline shaft is a little thicker in your pictures, but who knows. So, if I had to guess, I would say that the 22 spline shaft was never used with the keyed prop nut…. But let’s wait for others to chime in….
December 27, 2020 at 8:34 pm #226115Thank you for your reply.
I apologize for the rough sketches, but the shafts seems to be identical, except for the splines (and the prop nut attachment).
Further research would seem to indicate that the switch to a 23-spline was 1958 for Johnson…I can buy a 23-spline dog, but will it properly engage the ’57 gears? Am I falling down a rabbit hole that I ought not go down?
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
December 27, 2020 at 8:49 pm #226118Thank you for your reply.
I apologize for the rough sketches, but the shafts seems to be identical, except for the splines (and the prop nut attachment).
Further research would seem to indicate that the switch to a 23-spline was 1958 for Johnson…I can buy a 23-spline dog, but will it properly engage the ’57 gears? Am I falling down a rabbit hole that I ought not go down?
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
I think your assessment is correct. I also think your question about the dog fitting the gears is valid. But I don’t know the answer for sure. Yes there was a change in the outside diameter of the dog back around that time. Now the question becomes is it bigger or smaller? That, I don’t know without having the parts in front of me
December 27, 2020 at 8:59 pm #226119I’m also now seeing that the clutch dog cradle changed from ’57 to ’58 as well. Leads me to believe that there were enough changes made that this may be a fool’s endeavor. I’m beginning to think that having 2 types of prop nuts is not such a bad thing!
What do you think? Keep working on this or leave well enough alone?
EDIT: On a semi-related note, would anyone by chance have a parts manual for a Gale 35DE11B (and/or 12B…I think they’re the same)? I have the exploded drawings, but I don’t have the corresponding part number lists. It might be worthwhile to see what pieces/parts are in the gearcase that I’m using now and see if there’s major similarities / differences / shared parts / etc.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
December 27, 2020 at 11:24 pm #226138Is this any help ?
December 28, 2020 at 7:12 am #226139Appreciated, but would really like the Gale parts book. OMC often used different numbers for the same parts, and since the Gale gearcse is the one I use, establishing a baseline for parts would be very helpful.
That said, it ‘appears’ that ’57 may have been the last year for the threaded prop nut. Subsequent years for Johnson & Evinrude seem to show the shaft as 305104 (which marineengine.com shows to be interchangeable with 312867…the shaft I bought on eBay). My 1959 Viking parts book shows that as well.
I noted that the gearcase housings are the same for ’57 Johnson as well as 58-59 Johnson & Evinrude…and 59-60 Viking, too…so it seems that whatever changes were made (splines, dogs & cradles for sure) seems to span the product lines, but still use the same gear casing.
I guess my mission now is to determine a.) what Gale used in ’59 and b.) if there were radical changes to the gears (dimensions and/or ratios). I suppose I could open up my Gale gearcase and do a side-by-side, but like I said before, this all represents a lot of work for a fairly-unimportant final outcome.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
nj-boatbuilder57.
December 28, 2020 at 8:51 am #226141Well, I tried a somewhat similar experiment on a 60s bigtwin…. I thought I would “update” the propshaft and clutch dog to the later style using the spring/ball clutch dog set up for more positive engagement. Gearcase seemed to go together just fine, until it was assembled and I tried to shift the gears. Couldn’t shift into either gear from neutral…. Pulled it all apart and figured out the clutch dog lugs were indeed a little taller and wouldn’t fit into the older gears… Had to find new forward and reverse gears to make this conversion work…
So, please try to assemble the unit “dry-no sealer/orings, etc” to make sure your changes will work out before sealing everything up and having to do that job all over again….December 28, 2020 at 9:44 am #226146Garry,
Good to hear from you!!
JeffDecember 28, 2020 at 11:45 am #226152 -
This topic was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.