Home Forum Ask A Member Success…Lauson Pony Coil Converison w/ video

Viewing 8 posts - 11 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #16872
    chris-p
    Participant

      Mas, let me look, Im sure I have something that would help you out.

      #16895
      garry-in-michigan
      Participant

        Lifetime Member

        This is what I have –

        . . . . . 😉

        #16896
        mas
        Participant

          US Member - 2 Years

          Thank you guys for the insight. My only question is what determines the required capacitance? Is it the coil, flywheel magnet strength, point gap, plug type, plug gap, RPMs, material used…or all of the above??

          Thank you for your help!

          Mas

          #16898
          garry-in-michigan
          Participant

            Lifetime Member

            Mainly the coil, the magnets have a lesser influence.

            #16899
            legendre
            Participant

              @Chris_P

              That’s really interesting info..

              Back in the old days, 1920s-1930s, the cost of high-voltage & value condensers was much greater than today. If they used higher values, it would seem that it was a genuine necessity.. rather than just allowing a bit of slop.

              If they used lower values, then that would make more sense.. as it’s down to what they can get away with, for the money. I’ll be saving your post for later reference.

              ETA: @Gary – that’s brilliant! I’ve never seen such a chart.. thanks so much for posting it.

              #16901
              legendre
              Participant
                quote Mas:

                Thank you guys for the insight. My only question is what determines the required capacitance? Is it the coil (…)

                As I understand it, it’s primarily the inductance of the coil’s primary winding. The condenser forms a "tank circuit", which is a (frequency) tuned circuit, with the primary inductance. This means that the condenser / primary winding are most efficient at a particular frequency – and if you’re thinking, you already realize that the frequency is directly related to the speed of the engine.

                In short, a given combination of condenser value and coil inductance is most efficient at a particular frequency – aka a given RPM range.

                ETA: Gary had it.. it’s almost entirely the inductance of the coil’s primary winding.

                #17011
                Randy in Tampa
                Participant
                  quote Chris_P:

                  I would say for the 40s/50s/60s vintage magnetos, a lot are in the .18 to .22 range. Cannot really go wrong with .20 uf.

                  As the motors vintage gets earlier, the uf rating vary.

                  30s vintage motors average more in the .4 uf range (.36 to .44) These include the P30,P35, P40, P45, PR40, TR40, etc…. and Evinrude counterparts

                  Motors slightly older than that, such as the A35, A45, VR45, and the like had roughly a .3 uf rating (.27 to .33), and Evinrude counterparts Big Four, Speedi Twin, 460.

                  Very early motors, such as the A, A25, J25 had a much lower uf rating, as low as .09, but most I have tested are around .12, Evinrude counterparts Ace, Pal, Ranger, Cub, etc…

                  Mercs and Martins are all around .16 to .21

                  Olivers slightly lower at .13 to .17

                  Call me a weirdo, but I have a pretty good collection of condensors. Don’t ask me why. Also like to collect Magneto testing equipment, and manuals.

                  My wife wants to lock me up.

                  where do you find your condensers for the the Cub,Pal etc..Chris? 😕

                  #17030
                  ddoyle
                  Participant

                    Anyone who does not print those tables is Crazy! Huge thanks

                  Viewing 8 posts - 11 through 18 (of 18 total)
                  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.